Sunday, July 3, 2016

Changes in my practice

And so it comes to an end…at least this part of the journey. The past 32 weeks have been challenging, in both a positive way as I have developed my professional practice, and in a less rewarding way as I have struggled to maintain any work / life balance. Despite the drain on my family time, I see this as ‘short-term pain for long-term gain’. I am looking forward to using some downtime to refresh and relax, so that I can revisit the learning and ideas we’ve been presented with and look to incorporate more in my classroom teaching.

I found the whole course an exercise in reflective practice. Reflective practice is described by Osterman and Kottkamp (1993) as:

a challenging, demanding, and often trying process that is most successful as a collaborative effort” (p. 2).

I think this quote sums up the course perfectly!

Reflective practice, as professional development, leads to behavioural change on the basis of developing self-awareness. It is undertaken in response to a problem where there exists “the desire to function well in a professional capacity coupled with the awareness that current behavior is not fully reaching this goal” (Osterman et al, p12). Reflective practice requires active participation (experiential learning) by the learner and is usually most successful when done with others (Osterman et al, 1993). The hands-on activities, as well as the numerous professional discussions, both in class and online, provided many opportunities for developing self-awareness and questioning aspects of my practice and pedagogy. It also led to a number of changes, including how I teach collaboratively and my purposeful use of digital tools in the classroom. Personally, it was these professional conversations and connections that were one of the highlights of the course.

I have also gained a new appreciation of the place of research and using evidence to support changes in practice. This has already proved useful in my team leader role as I have needed to draw on evidence in research to support some of the changes I have been implementing.

The assignments, whilst all time-consuming, have had a direct impact on my practice. My DCL assignments led to the development of a maths weebly that is in constant use in my classroom. My implementation of this digital tool was the focus of my LDC assignments. My literature review and subsequent research plan have formed the basis of my leadership inquiry at school this year and I am looking to begin implementing this next term. Within the Applied Practice part of the course, I have found it an interesting experience ‘defining’ myself and my practice, and having to share this online has opened up (still tentative for now…) new online connections.

When reflecting on this course against the practising teacher criteria, I think I could find evidence for nearly all 12 criteria. However, the two most significant would be:

Criteria 4: Demonstrate commitment to ongoing professional learning and development of professional personal practice.
  •       Any course requiring the amount of time and effort as this one did, is a definite demonstration of a commitment to ongoing professional development. To make the course meaningful, I tried really hard to make any changes or new learning relevant to my own context – hence why all the assignments have been implemented in my classroom.

Criteria 5: Show leadership that contributes to effective teaching and learning.
  •       As I took on a new team leader role soon after beginning the course (big commitment!), I found the leadership aspect of the course very beneficial. I was able to use theories around leadership to support me in my new role and the assignments gave me a great scaffold for implementing change successfully.

Where to next…

As already mentioned, I’m looking forward to having some time and space (mental capacity!) to revisit many of the ideas and learning that I’ve seen over the past 32 weeks – in particular, the digital tools we were introduced to.

I have also been inspired to continue the post-graduate journey and I have ‘pencilled-in’ the Masters course as a next step. Not this year though, as I also feel a responsibility to dedicate some time and energy to my team leader role at school, as well as to my family. In the meantime, my own professional development will still continue through the online connections I have made and communities I now belong to. I enjoy following links and reading blogs and see great benefit and opportunities in doing so – especially now that I’ll have more time!

References

Osterman, K. & Kottkamp, R.(1993). Reflective Practice for Educators.California.Cornwin Press, Inc. Retrieved on 7th May, 2015 fromhttp://www.itslifejimbutnotasweknowit.org.uk/files/RefPract/Osterman_Kottkamp_extract.pdf

Ministry of Education (nd). Practising teacher Criteria and e-learning . Retrieved from http://elearning.tki.org.nz/Professional-learning/Registered-Teacher-Criteria-and-e-learning

Saturday, July 2, 2016

Crossing Boundaries and Creating Connections

In primary schools, working in an integrated or interdisciplinary approach is not a new idea. According to Mathison and Freeman (1997), these approaches have been associated with progressive education movements for nearly a century.

An integrated curriculum, or inquiry-based learning, can work effectively in the primary classroom as we have some autonomy over our timetabling and presentation of learning. Using authentic contexts for learning makes it easier for students to make links between their learning and real life, comprehend multiple perspectives, and develop strategies for problem solving across disciplines (Mathison et. Al, 1997). What can make it harder to sustain, and be manageable, is the ‘just in time’ nature of the planning when responding to student wonderings or current events to provide that ‘real-life’ connection. Also, as we move into collaborative teaching partnerships, I question whether we will have the same opportunities to respond to evolving student voice as we seek to meet the differing needs of different teachers…and possibly a less flexible timetable? Having said that, I, and my colleagues, aspire to integrate as much as we can as we recognise the benefits for the learner in learning to cross boundaries and make connections – essential skills for 21st Century.

Interdisciplinary Connection Map


When I reflect on myself as a professional, and my working environment, I can describe myself in 3 capacities – as a teacher, as a team leader, and as a learner. All of these identities are linked. As a teacher, I have a number of responsibilities and connections to different groups concerned with student achievement and progress. As a learner, I am continually seeking to up-skill and keep abreast of current thinking so that my practice is as effective as possible (and therefore has a positive impact on student achievement and progress). As a team leader, my ultimate responsibility is still student achievement but within the context of empowering and enabling the teachers within my team to be as effective as possible whilst also promoting best practice across the school. Although these 3 identities have the same overall objective, there are times when they can feel at odds with each other – when one is perhaps taking more time or energy than another (MindLab, at times, for example!), or when the immediate aims of a particular ‘task’ or requirement for one role seem counterproductive for another (e.g. report writing!). It is a constant juggling act to keep the balance right and to maintain focus on the big picture.

Two of the potential connections highlighted (in grey on my map) are both linked to myself as a learner. My research project (MindLab – using digital tools for the effective assessment of writing) already has had an effect as it has formed the basis of my leadership inquiry for this year. This is impacting on my practice as a team leader and the influence I am having on my team members. I have also identified the possibility of following up this course with the Masters course – although not immediately! In the near future though, I hope to build on the learning from this experience and continue with my own professional development as I see the benefits it has on my other professional ‘roles’. By continuing to make connections between my 3 professional identities, I hope to contribute effectively in all 3 disciplines.

References


Mathison,S.. & Freeman, M.(1997). The logic of interdisciplinary studies. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 1997. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/cela/reports/mathisonlogic12004.pdf: